The Christian Science Monitor/ March 17, 2009.
Article by Kelly Hearn.
"Top US defense officials are envisioning ways that American military personnel, equipment, and installations might be affected by extreme weather events, rising ocean temperatures, shifts in rainfall patterns, and other natural resource stresses projected to accompany global climate change – stresses that may exacerbate existing security threats and breed new ones. Experts disagree on the scale and timing of threats."
Hey, Experts disagree on the fact that extreme weather events, rising ocean temperatures, shifts in rainfall patterns, and other natural resource stresses will accompany global climate change.
"The US intelligence community, for example, recently wrote a National Intelligence Assessment on the national security impacts of global climate change through 2030."
The US intelligence community! That would be Military Intelligence,wouldn't it? That's an oxymoron!
"Another presidential report prepared by the US intelligence community, Global Trends 2025, has climate change as a top talking point."
"US intelligence community! Again the oxymoron. Climate change is the top talking point? OK! CO2 is not guilty! CO2 is not pollution! Vostok ice core samples show that temperature rise precedes rises in atmospheric CO2. Anyone still believing in Co2 causing Global Warming should make sure their membership to the flat earth society is still current because they are that far behind the science.
Christian Science - either get up to date with the latest science or rejoin the flat earthers!
Showing posts with label Flat Earth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Flat Earth. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Flat-Eath IPCC: Warning of wildfire threat to tropical forests
Chris Field, co-chair of the UN's Nobel prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change told the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Chicago that the panel's report on climate change in 2007 had underestimated the severity of global warming this century.
Does that mean that their GCM's were wrong? Does that mean the, despite saying the contrary, the IPCC does predict future temperature and weather?
"We now have data showing that from 2000 to 2007, greenhouse gas emissions increased far more rapidly than we expected, primarily because developing countries, like China and India, saw a huge upsurge in electric power generation, almost all of it based on coal," Field said.
But, with respect, Mr Field, you do not as yet have data linking Greenhouse gases with Global Warming despite Billions spent over twenty years.
In fact, your flat-earth society IPCC has ignored, or chosen to not take into calculations, the Ice-Core samples that show that rise in CO2 follows temperature rise.
The next report, which he will oversee, is due in 2014 and will now include future scenarios where warming is more serious than previous reports have suggested.
Will; you even issue AR5 if there has not been warming for 16 years?
Does that mean that their GCM's were wrong? Does that mean the, despite saying the contrary, the IPCC does predict future temperature and weather?
"We now have data showing that from 2000 to 2007, greenhouse gas emissions increased far more rapidly than we expected, primarily because developing countries, like China and India, saw a huge upsurge in electric power generation, almost all of it based on coal," Field said.
But, with respect, Mr Field, you do not as yet have data linking Greenhouse gases with Global Warming despite Billions spent over twenty years.
In fact, your flat-earth society IPCC has ignored, or chosen to not take into calculations, the Ice-Core samples that show that rise in CO2 follows temperature rise.
The next report, which he will oversee, is due in 2014 and will now include future scenarios where warming is more serious than previous reports have suggested.
Will; you even issue AR5 if there has not been warming for 16 years?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)